Should also cover showing subspecies counts.
Should also cover showing counts for non-bird species.
In addition, it should be possible to order values within drop-down list properties.
EXIF meta-data should already be shown in the photo-information screen. Please send an email to support if that's not the case for you.
I understand this suggestion to specifically cover tags and application specific meta-data.
Are you aware you can do this already by creating a custom taxonomy & species?
I would want to add them separately from the official AOU/ABA taxonomies. But they could be published as a separate taxonomy to the library and perhaps be installed for users by default.
What do you think? Happy to approve a "Hybrid & Sp Birds of North America" or similar if published to the library. Perhaps needs a more catchy name..
Thanks for the great suggestion Edward.
@Annie, clicking on species count bars/segments in graphs takes you to a list of those species, which I think is the most logical behaviour.
It does require an extra click to, e.g. filter to a year, in the entries screen. We'll soon be adding date-range filtering to this, so although it's an extra click away, you'll have more flexibility for it.
I find this suggestion most compelling where it's not already possible to search via the filters. E.g., as discussed, searching by year is already possible using the filters, whereas it's not possible to pick the starting letter of locations, so on a tablet the only option is to scroll all the way.
I'll take a closer look at how Windows 10 does this too.
Great suggestion Edward! This wont make the initial launch, but something to consider for an update. Many thanks for sharing.
We'll have the web version of Bird Journal within a few months which you should be able to use from Windows phone. Also, the v5 Windows app runs nicely on Surface tablets.
At this time though, I would say it is unlikely we'll have a Windows Phone app unless the market changes significantly.
Update: Things are looking up with Windows 10 - it appears to make it easier for Android/iOS app developers, especially with "universal" apps that can run on both desktop & mobile.
We'll soon be creating a combined mac/web/Windows app: http://support.birdjournal.com/forums/262707-general/suggestions/6312991-mac-version
This will run on Windows Phone as a website, but not a native app, so not suited for use in the field.
Steve's comments from an idea that was merged into this one: "I know I've asked before, but is there any light at the end of the tunnel to develop an App for this phone? More people are now using Windows Phones and it is always a shame to see company's leaving this format out when developing Apps. With the coming Windows 10 which will work on all Windows devices, surely this is the time to do it as 1 App will work on any windows 10 platform."
I'm not seeing the wheel move so far here. I did a quick check and I suspect it may be possible to configure the distance the mouse wheel scrolls.
Please take a look at "To change how the mouse wheel works" section here: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-gb/windows/change-mouse-settings#1TC=windows-7
I didn't have any such options, but perhaps you do?
Thank you Edward. Is this on Mac or Windows?
Great suggestion, thanks!
This is a bug that we intend to fix.
Great suggestion. Not sure why this wasn't done initially.
You can filter to any ancestor location as well, eg. the county/country/continent, not just the location originally recorded. It's possible the country will not show in the filter box if eg. all of your records are within a single county - in this case filtering to the county achieves the same as filtering to the country anyway.
Geographical regions are more difficult as they don't fit neatly into a hierarchy. We've got ideas on how to address this though.
You can filter records entered to get lists for a location, year/month, or even by property. Is this not what you are looking for?
Filters will be arriving on the mobile apps very shortly.
Should this also allow to print them (graphs, maps & photos) directly?
Also, this should include maps.
We plan to make it easier to view a trip report. PDF/Word export can be achieved via third party tools, but we could add it directly.
There are a number of separate suggestions - I'll mark this one as finished when they've all been completed.
Great suggestion, and something we're planning to do later in the year.
Just click on the "Entry" tab at the top of the screen when editing an entry. You will be able to update the location for the entry there.
This is possible on the Android and iOS apps. Just type the name of the new location, and it will prompt you to choose a parent to complete the new location.
We removed it in v4 desktop version as it made things very complicated (from a software perspective). We'd like to add it back, but similar to in the Android and iOS apps where you can quickly add a single location, rather than see the full locations editor.
You can use the Wildlife Recorder template as found here:
It's not independent of commercial software, but is a perfectly generic format that is understood by Bird Journal.
Perhaps it would be useful to allow import of custom formats and have Bird Journal "suggest" which columns are which? (Hopefully getting it right most of the time)
Thanks! Looks like we need to do this too.
Current thinking is to have an option in settings, eg:
Sync photos: Never, Desktop only, Always. Where the default would be "Desktop only", meaning photos would sync to all copies of Bird Journal on a PC, but mobile apps would still only download (and store) photos as needed.
What do you think?
Is this the same suggestion as http://support.birdjournal.com/forums/262707-general/suggestions/6325824-route-tracking ?
Also report the distance of the route.
Yes, it's often not discovered, as well.. we'd rather the app just didn't crash!
Indeed, the filtering suggestion is still relevant and shouldn't be too hard
Actually changes are saved each time you add a species, such that if your phone crashed or ran out of power, you are given the option to resume editing. So it might be the easiest to just leave it in edit mode.
We're considering allowing the filter setting to be remembered also though, so that whenever you visit a site where that filtered location is still relevant (eg. Maybe you filtered to the county level), it will be applied automatically. The filter will only not be set if you create/edit an entry where the filtered location it's relevant.
Would this help?